Default, Framing and Spillover Effects: The Case of Lifecycle Funds in 401(k) Plans

Olivia S. Mitchell, Gary R. Mottola, Stephen P. Utkus, Takeshi Yamaguchi

NBER Working Paper No. 15108
Issued in June 2009
NBER Program(s):Economics of Aging, Labor Studies, Public Economics

Important behavioral factors such as default and framing effects are increasingly being employed to optimize decision-making in a variety of settings, including individually-directed retirement plans. Yet such approaches may have unintended "spillover" effects, as we show with regard to the introduction of lifecycle funds in U.S. 401(k) plans. As anticipated, lifecycle funds do reshape individual portfolio choices through large default and framing effects. But unexpectedly, they also create a new class of investors which holds these funds as part of more complex portfolios. Our results are directly relevant to those interested in retirement plan design and retirement security; they also highlight the importance of assessing such spillover effects in other consequential settings where behavioral economics techniques may be employed.

A non-technical summary of this paper is available in the September 2009 NBER Digest.  You can sign up to receive the NBER Digest by email.

Acknowledgments

Machine-readable bibliographic record - MARC, RIS, BibTeX

Document Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3386/w15108

Users who downloaded this paper also downloaded* these: